Partnership to Provide Automated Segregation of Duties Review with Enhanced Security for ERP Users
Dallas, Texas, July 31st, SafePaaS the leading policy-based access...
UK Police Department using ERP Cloud given “Significant Deficiency” by Grant Thornton partially due to “Segregation of Duties” issues and system accounts.
Read full article here
“The commissioner’s Audit Advisory Committee report of a 27 May 2020 meeting said the Oracle Fusion system, which went live in 2019 in the Oracle-based Multi-Force Shared Service (MFSS) group system, included “segregation of duties conflicts in Oracle Fusion between IT security and finance duties.”
Access control issues including Segregation of Duties conflicts and Sensitive Access Risks are pervasive in the seeded roles provided by Oracle. Oracle recommends that organizations work with their System Integrators during their implementation process to reduce risk through the customization of roles. Yet, Oracle does not provide the means to test SoD conflicts and Sensitive Access risks without purchasing their Advanced Access Controls (AAC) solution – a part of the Risk Management Cloud.
Sadly, Oracle charges customers for a tool (AAC) that is needed by every organization to test their security design – whether they are publicly traded, subject to regulations like Sarbanes-Oxley, or privately held and merely looking to reduce fraud and protect the integrity of their system.
“Risk that internal access to information assets and administrative functionality may not be restricted based on legitimate business need.”
Flagged as a “significant deficiency” by auditors at Grant Thornton, the problem meant 18 MFSS or Capgemini system administrator’s accounts – service accounts that have the IT security manager role assigned to them – also had privileged access to the finance system. “This breaches good practice to split these abilities,” the committee report said, and could allow account control by the vendor to “change system configurations,” meaning “there is a risk that system-enforced internal control mechanisms are bypassed through inappropriate use of administrative functionality.”
These issues are common practice at nearly every implementation we have reviewed.
Realistically, we believe most organizations are subject to a control deficiency that could easily rise to the level of a Significant Deficiency. We have seen these types of deficiencies, when combined with others, rise to a Material Weakness.
ERP Risk Advisors offers a free review of your internal controls environment when the organization completes the self-assessment at: https://www.erpra.net/erp-armor/
ERP Risk Advisors also offers a one-time or recurring service that allows organizations to test their access controls to help inoculate their organization for risks such as what was experienced by the Chesire Police.
If you are interested, please contact us here: https://www.erpra.net/contact-us/
Dallas, Texas, July 31st, SafePaaS the leading policy-based access...
In NetSuite, permissions grant access to specific functions, defining exactly what users can see and do within the system. These fall into four main types: Transactions,...