GovCon Wednesdays
Estimated Read Time: 5 minutes

DCAA audits usually don’t happen “out of nowhere.” In most cases, an audit is triggered because the Government needs independent audit support to make a contract decision (award, rates, billing, or closeout), or because your contract type and clauses require specific compliance steps.

This post breaks down the most common DCAA audit triggers and what government contractors can do to stay audit-ready without overbuilding processes.

Why DCAA audit triggers matter for GovCons

A DCAA audit can affect far more than compliance. It can impact:

• Award momentum (especially on cost-type work)
• Cash flow (billing approvals, provisional rates, questioned costs)
• Indirect rate confidence (how the Government views your pools and bases)
• Closeout timelines (final rates, final voucher, contract closure)

Quick reality check

Even strong contractors get audited. The goal isn’t to “avoid” audits it’s to be ready so audits don’t disrupt operations, billing, or credibility.

The 8 most common DCAA audit triggers

1) You’re pursuing or awarded a cost-reimbursable contract

Cost-type contracts put more responsibility on the contractor to track and support costs properly. That’s why the Government often requests an accounting system evaluation when cost reimbursement is involved especially if you’re newer to GovCon or scaling quickly.

What DCAA is validating

Can your system reliably:

• Segregate direct vs. indirect
• Identify costs by contract / task
• Support allowability and exclude unallowables
• Produce job cost detail without manual workarounds

2) A pre-award accounting system review is requested (SF 1408)

A classic trigger is a request to document your accounting system against SF 1408 criteria as part of a pre-award survey, especially for contractors new to GovCon or receiving certain contract/payment structures.

Practical tip

If you’re “Excel-heavy,” you can still be adequate but only if controls, consistency, and documentation are strong and repeatable.

3) FAR 52.216-7 applies—and your year-end submission clock starts

If your contract includes FAR 52.216-7 (Allowable Cost and Payment), it creates recurring compliance expectations tied to allowable costs, billing, and final indirect cost rates.

Why this triggers audit activity

Because the Government ultimately needs supportable numbers to:

• Establish final indirect rates
• Resolve billed vs. allowable costs
• Close out cost-type work cleanly

4) Your Incurred Cost Submission (ICS) enters the review cycle

Submitting an ICS (often called an incurred cost proposal) commonly leads to incurred cost audit work because the Government needs confidence the costs claimed are allowable, allocable, and reasonable.

What auditors typically examine

• Support for indirect pools (fringe, overhead, G&A)
• Proper bases and allocations
• Unallowable cost identification and segregation
• Consistency between the ICS, GL, and supporting schedules

5) Timekeeping becomes a focal point (floor checks / MAARs)

Labor is often the largest cost input so timekeeping is a high-value audit area. DCAA conducts floor checks and related procedures as part of specialized incurred cost activities known as MAARs (Mandatory Annual Audit Requirements).

What a floor check is trying to confirm

• Employees understand how to charge time correctly
• Time entries reflect actual work performed
• Corrections are controlled, documented, and appropriate

Note: Floor checks can be unannounced, depending on the situation.

6) A contracting officer needs audit support for a contract action

Sometimes the trigger isn’t your internal issue it’s a Government need. COs/ACOs may request audit support for actions like:

• Evaluating a proposal (especially cost realism on cost-type work)
• Reviewing forward pricing or rate support
• Validating billing matters tied to contract administration
• Supporting contract closeout decisions

Why it matters

If your files aren’t ready, the timeline pressure can quickly become an internal fire drill.

7) Indirect rates look unusual (or lack a clean story)

Indirect rates don’t have to be “perfect” but they must be defensible. Rates often get scrutiny when there are sharp fluctuations or inconsistent treatment of costs year over year.

Common drivers of rate scrutiny

• Rapid hiring or turnover affecting fringe
• New facility or major tool spend hitting overhead
• Reclassifications between direct, overhead, and G&A without a clear policy
• Unallowables drifting into pools

8) Prior findings, deficiencies, or repeat issues exist

If your company has a history of deficiencies or recurring findings, the Government may increase scrutiny or follow up to validate corrective actions.

The risk isn’t just the finding it’s the pattern

Repeat issues can expand sample sizes, increase documentation requests, and slow billing/closeout.

What you can do now to reduce audit disruption

You don’t need a “perfect” system you need a controlled, consistent one.

Focus on these audit-readiness foundations

• Monthly reconciliation: GL → job cost → billing → bank
• Written policies employees actually follow (timekeeping, expenses, approvals, corrections)
• Clear support for costs (invoices, receipts, subcontract files, labor documentation)
• Separate unallowables so they don’t contaminate pools
• Train employees on “how we charge time here”

FAQs: DCAA audit triggers (quick answers)

What’s the most common reason contractors get audited?

Cost-type work and incurred cost activity are among the most common drivers because the Government needs support for allowability and final rate decisions.

Can small businesses get DCAA audited?

Yes. Size doesn’t prevent audit activity—contract type, clauses, and contract administration needs are bigger drivers than headcount.

Does having FAR 52.216-7 automatically mean an audit?

Not “automatically,” but it increases the likelihood of audit involvement because it ties to allowable cost billing and final indirect rate processes.

What triggers a timekeeping audit or floor check?

Labor risk and MAAR-related procedures can trigger timekeeping testing, especially when labor is material to contracts.

What should I do if I think an audit is coming?

Get ahead of documentation (policies, reconciliations, support files) and identify weak spots before DCAA does especially in timekeeping and indirect rates.

Key takeaways

• DCAA audits are usually triggered by contract type, clauses, and Government decision needs not randomness.
• SF 1408 / pre-award accounting system requests are common when pursuing cost-type work.
• FAR 52.216-7 and incurred cost activity often drive audit attention tied to final rates and allowability.
• Timekeeping is a frequent focus area, including floor checks associated with MAARs.

If you’re unsure whether your accounting, timekeeping, and documentation would hold up under scrutiny, VSINGH CPA can help you get audit-ready with practical controls that fit how GovCons actually operate.

👉 Check out our YouTube Shorts for quick GovCon Essentials: https://youtube.com/shorts/_jdB10nFC5Q?feature=share

What’s next in the DCAA Audit Readiness Series

✅ DCAA Audit Readiness Series #1: What Triggers a DCAA Audit?
2️⃣ DCAA Audit Readiness Series #2: Pre-Audit Readiness Checklist for GovCons
3️⃣ DCAA Audit Readiness Series #3: Common DCAA Findings (and How to Avoid Them)
4️⃣ DCAA Audit Readiness Series #4: Timekeeping & Labor Compliance Red Flags
5️⃣ DCAA Audit Readiness Series #5: Indirect Rates Under Audit Scrutiny
6️⃣ DCAA Audit Readiness Series #6: How to Respond to DCAA Requests
7️⃣ DCAA Audit Readiness Series #7: Audit Outcomes: Pass, Deficiency, or Corrective Action
8️⃣ DCAA Audit Readiness Series #8: What Happens After the Audit?