This blog will discuss data replication to the cloud, namely:
The modern enterprise is increasingly reliant on cloud computing. The cloud offers a variety of benefits to the organization and is essential to meeting the needs of a company’s customers and growing remote workforces.
As business needs evolve, the drawbacks of legacy systems within on-premises data centers become more apparent. Attempting to support a modern, distributed enterprise with these systems is labor-intensive for IT and can be more expensive for the organization.
Cloud data replication provides a solution to this issue by allowing an organization to gradually transition its operations away from these legacy systems. It also has the benefit of providing higher availability and improved redundancy and resiliency.
Cloud data replication refers to the practice of making a copy of the data stored on one physical or virtualized server to another cloud-based instance. This replication can be performed synchronously, which involves sending updates to the backup instance in real time, or asynchronously, where updates are made to the backup instance at periodic intervals rather than continuously.
The choice between synchronous and asynchronous replication impacts the organization’s recovery time objectives (RTO) and recovery point objectives (RPO). For example, synchronous replication offers extremely low RPO because the backup server is completely in sync with the primary. If a failure of the primary server causes a switchover to the backup, this can be performed quickly (low RTO) and with little or no data loss. However, synchronous replication can be expensive, resource-intensive, and its performance depends heavily upon that of the network link connecting the two servers.
Asynchronous replication, on the other hand, offers lower cost and resource consumption and can operate effectively over longer, lower-performance network links. However, this comes at the potential cost of a higher RPO because all data generated between the last synchronization and the failure of the primary server will be lost.
The choice between synchronous and asynchronous data replication should be based on an organization’s use case. Synchronous replication is better when the organization can afford no data loss, while asynchronous replication is better for budget-constrained and less critical projects, such as saving test data from the development environment.
Some reasons why an organization may choose to perform cloud data replication include:
While replicating data to the cloud can provide a number of different benefits to an organization, it also has its challenges, such as:
Despite these challenges, cloud data replication is probably worth the effort. The cost of losing sensitive and valuable data due to a server failure is much higher than that of implementing an effective data replication solution.
Achieving high availability is a common goal for data replication. Accomplishing this requires synchronous replication because the backup server must be constantly in sync with the primary. However, synchronous data replication can be expensive and perform poorly if done incorrectly.
The Silk Platform makes it easy to replicate data into the cloud. The platform’s technology includes enterprise data services that make it easy to both replicate data as well as take zero-footprint clones. So that the data you store in the cloud never balloons out of control. And because Silk sits between your databases, applications, and other workloads and the underlying infrastructure, you can easily lift and shift data from on-prem to the cloud or from one cloud to another.
Learn more about how Silk can make data replication in the cloud a breeze. Visit www.silk.us.