Pre employment testing helps employers turn a subjective decision into a winning HR strategy and a reduced chance of on-the-job injury.
Louis Pasteur famously stated, “Chance favors the prepared mind.” While he was probably talking about medical breakthroughs, he was undoubtedly referring to healthy due diligence when it comes to big decisions. And for businesses, one of the biggest decisions with the most impact to workplace culture and bottom line is who to hire.
Not every person is suited for every job. It’s just the truth; and while anyone may be encouraged to apply for a position with a high amount of bodily stress, physicality, lifting requirements, repetitive motion, or any other combination of strenuous physical activity, not just anyone is actually suited for the long-term performance of those tasks. But how can a company know, objectively, who the right candidates are—and who might be an on-the-job injury waiting to happen? The answer is post-offer, pre employment physical abilities testing.
Administering a series of research-based, peer-reviewed tests built specifically for your business’s unique functional requirements shifts hiring from a roulette wheel of risk and potential injury into a substantiated, defensible decision based in science. But pre-hire, post offer physical abilities testing does more than just that:
Test early and often to reap the full benefits of pre-employment physical abilities testing, and stop workplace injuries before they have a chance to happen—before the first day on the job. Know your workplace, its stressors and unique tasks. Choose a smart solution that’s vetted—an independently researched, peer-reviewed, screen designed just for your business and its specific work activities.
Screening before you hire is smart, and can keep your business out of trouble, out of court, and out of the unenviable position of having to deal with workplace injury that could potentially have been avoided.
[1] Littleton M, Cost-effectiveness of a prework screening program for the University of Illinois at Chicago Physical Plant. Work 21 (2003),243-250.