I had no idea how I was going to pull through last year as both a department chair and instructional leadership team (ILT) member for the first time. I doubted myself. Not only was it my first time in this role, but I was also filling the shoes of a previous leader who had retired, and we were right in the middle of a global pandemic. Lucky for me, it was also the first year our school partnered with Lead by Learning to help us develop our school goals and leadership.
At the beginning, I was concerned about the direction I wanted my department to take. At our first Lead by Learning meeting, we were challenged to choose an area to focus on to increase opportunity for Public Learning and foment the academic identity of our students of color at De Anza High School. With this focus in mind, I decided that we would dedicate our work towards creating content in our department that would focus more on being culturally relevant to increase student engagement in language courses.
But then self doubt crept in:
During the initial department meetings, I could not shake off the feeling of inadequacy. I attempted to come up with ways I was using Public Learning in my classroom to show my colleagues but following those meetings, I failed to see others trying those strategies in their own classrooms. The data was showing me that something wasn’t working, but I could not even identify where I needed to get started.
Then we had our monthly meeting with Lead by Learning, and as a Public Learner, a colleague shared their wondering and dilemma, “How can I get my group of adult learners to become more curious?”
As I heard his question, my eyes opened wide! Their question resonated with the exact difficulty I was having. From hearing this colleague share and seeing his data, everything came to me. I wanted our department to become curious about student engagement, about what it is to be culturally relevant, and about the tools we use to collect, measure, and interpret data to inform our instruction about those objectives.
Now that my goal was clearer, I was struggling to answer the question, “How?” I decided to schedule another coaching meeting with my Lead by Learning facilitator and explained that I needed to rethink the way I was approaching my goal to see more curiosity from the department. She then did her magic and encouraged me to reflect on this new direction. She had me answer some questions like:
She helped me identify assumptions I was making and things I had not yet tried. She worked with me to elaborate on how I was going to proceed to achieve the results I wanted to see in my department. I was asking my colleagues to do something that I was doing on my own, but that didn’t necessarily mean they felt confident to try those things on their own. We came to the conclusion that my colleagues needed scaffolds to be able to engage in Public Learning and to be able to create content that is culturally relevant.
Scaffolds we developed:
During the second semester, we reset our initial approach and began to use the scaffolds. This led to more productive meetings where we discussed the graphic organizer and kept our conversation focused on culturally relevant content. Our conversations began to sound like: “This is why this lesson is culturally relevant,” “These are the standards the students will demonstrate,” “Here’s how I am going to check for engagement,” “At this point I’m not sure how to collect data yet.” Then, we started to support each other more by providing feedback and collaborating more for our students.
My Key Learnings this Year: